New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.9 percentage points (78.2% vs 52.3%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.
| Metric | New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 54/100 (C) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 52.3% | 78.2%* |
| Total Assets | $34.0B | $37.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $65.0B | $47.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.0B | $10.3B* |
| Participants | 425,000 | 425,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.1% | 6.1%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of New Jersey | State of Indiana |
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.9 percentage points (78.2% vs 52.3%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.