Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) grades C while Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 48% vs 105%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 57.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 48.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricNew Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
51/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
48.1%105.1%*
Total Assets$28.5B$24.8B
Total Liabilities$59.3B$23.6B*
Unfunded Liability$30.8B$0*
Participants268,000230,039
1-Year Investment Return4.9%5.7%*
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of New JerseyIUOE Local 324

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 57.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 48.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More