Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) (B) and New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 68% and 64% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 66/100 (B) compared to New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (67.9% vs 64.1%). New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 108,000 participants.

MetricNew Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
66/100 (B)*58/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.9%*64.1%
Total Assets$16.2B$14.5B
Total Liabilities$23.9B$22.6B*
Unfunded Liability$7.7B*$8.1B
Participants108,00092,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.3%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorState of New MexicoState of New Mexico

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 66/100 (B) compared to New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (67.9% vs 64.1%). New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 108,000 participants.

Explore More