Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) (A) and School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 95% and 68% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.4 percentage points (95.3% vs 67.9%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

MetricNew York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*66/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
95.3%*67.9%
Total Assets$248.0B$16.2B
Total Liabilities$260.2B$23.9B*
Unfunded Liability$12.2B$7.7B*
Participants1,070,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return7.1%*5.3%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorState of New YorkState of Ohio

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.4 percentage points (95.3% vs 67.9%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

Explore More