Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) (A) and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 95% and 80% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (95.3% vs 80.2%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

MetricNew York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
95.3%*80.2%
Total Assets$248.0B$90.0B
Total Liabilities$260.2B$112.2B*
Unfunded Liability$12.2B*$22.2B
Participants1,070,000507,000
1-Year Investment Return7.1%*6.0%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkState of Ohio

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (95.3% vs 80.2%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

Explore More