Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) (A) and UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 95% and 86% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 9.4 percentage points (85.9% vs 95.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricNew York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)93/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
95.3%*85.9%
Total Assets$248.0B$5.2B
Total Liabilities$260.2B$6.0B*
Unfunded Liability$12.2B$848.9M*
Participants1,070,000365,494
1-Year Investment Return7.1%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkUFCW International

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 9.4 percentage points (85.9% vs 95.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More