Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) and UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 97% and 86% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.2 percentage points (85.9% vs 97.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)93/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
97.1%*85.9%
Total Assets$131.0B$5.2B
Total Liabilities$134.9B$6.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.9B$848.9M*
Participants433,000365,494
1-Year Investment Return6.8%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkUFCW International

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.2 percentage points (85.9% vs 97.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More