Skip to main content
PensionRisk

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs AT&T Pension Benefit Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) grades B while AT&T Pension Benefit Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 77% vs 94%.

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 76.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

MetricNYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
71/100 (B)97/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
76.8%93.7%*
Total Assets$77.2B$30.0B
Total Liabilities$100.5B$32.0B*
Unfunded Liability$23.3B$2.0B*
Participants370,000286,355
1-Year Investment Return5.6%6.9%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorNew York CityAT&T Inc.

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 76.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

Explore More