NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (76.8% vs 72.3%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.8%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $77.2B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $100.5B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.3B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 370,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.6% | 5.9%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | New York City | State of Kansas |
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (76.8% vs 72.3%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.