NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 13.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 63.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) | Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B)* | 57/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.8%* | 63.1% |
| Total Assets | $77.2B | $36.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $100.5B | $57.4B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.3B | $21.2B* |
| Participants | 370,000 | 245,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.6%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | New York City | State of Pennsylvania |
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 13.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 63.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.