NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.3 percentage points (74.2% vs 67.9%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 74.2%* | 67.9% |
| Total Assets | $92.0B | $16.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $23.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $32.0B | $7.7B* |
| Participants | 225,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.4%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | New York City | State of Ohio |
NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.3 percentage points (74.2% vs 67.9%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.