Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 81.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 79/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 81.8% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $55.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $67.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $12.2B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 472,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 6.9%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | AT&T Inc. |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 81.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.