Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 80.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $83.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $16.5B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | General Motors |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 80.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.