Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) grades A while Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C. Funding ratios: 83% vs 64%.

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 64.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.

MetricOhio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS)Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.5%*64.1%
Total Assets$105.0B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$127.3B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$22.3B$11.8B*
Participants762,000430,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorState of OhioUnited Association (UA)

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 64.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.

Explore More