Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (82.5% vs 83.5%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $98.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $16.2B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | University of California |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (82.5% vs 83.5%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.