Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 77.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 71/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 77.8% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $44.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $56.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $12.6B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 335,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | United Parcel Service |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 77.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.