Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) (A) and Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 83% and 94% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.5%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricOhio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS)Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)97/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.5%94.1%*
Total Assets$105.0B$55.6B
Total Liabilities$127.3B$59.1B*
Unfunded Liability$22.3B$3.5B*
Participants762,000634,861
1-Year Investment Return6.2%6.2%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of OhioTeamsters Western Conference

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.5%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More