Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (B) and Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 77% and 70% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.2 percentage points (77.3% vs 70.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3%* | 70.1% |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $31.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $44.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B | $13.4B* |
| Participants | 375,000 | 327,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | State of Texas |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.2 percentage points (77.3% vs 70.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.