Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs General Electric Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 76.2%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | General Electric Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B) | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3%* | 76.2% |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $38.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $50.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B | $12.0B* |
| Participants | 375,000 | 318,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 76.2%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.