Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Verizon Management Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Verizon Management Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.5 percentage points (77.3% vs 79.8%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Verizon Management Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B) | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3% | 79.8%* |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $26.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $32.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B | $6.6B* |
| Participants | 375,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7% | 7.1%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | Verizon Communications |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Verizon Management Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.5 percentage points (77.3% vs 79.8%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.