Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 35.8 percentage points (57.8% vs 22.0%). Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) covers 518,000 participants.
| Metric | Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 54/100 (C)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 57.8%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $72.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.6B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $52.6B | $33.7B* |
| Participants | 518,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.1%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Pennsylvania | Teamsters Central States |
Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 35.8 percentage points (57.8% vs 22.0%). Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) covers 518,000 participants.