Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 105%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 41.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 64.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%105.1%*
Total Assets$21.0B$24.8B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$23.6B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$0*
Participants430,000230,039
1-Year Investment Return5.5%5.7%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorUnited Association (UA)IUOE Local 324

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 41.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 64.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More