Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 86%.

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 64.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundUFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)93/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%85.9%*
Total Assets$21.0B$5.2B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$6.0B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$848.9M*
Participants430,000365,494
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*4.8%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorUnited Association (UA)UFCW International

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 64.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More