Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees vs Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) and Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 106% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 17.9 percentage points (106.1% vs 124.0%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

MetricRaytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesJohnson & Johnson Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
106.1%124.0%*
Total Assets$43.8B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$41.3B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants288,39583,076
1-Year Investment Return7.3%7.5%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorRTX CorporationJohnson & Johnson

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 17.9 percentage points (106.1% vs 124.0%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons