Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) and UPS Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 106% and 91% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.3 percentage points (106.1% vs 90.7%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.
| Metric | Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 100/100 (A)* | 95/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 106.1%* | 90.7% |
| Total Assets | $43.8B | $9.7B |
| Total Liabilities | $41.3B | $10.7B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $0* | $993.0M |
| Participants | 288,395 | 243,932 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.3%* | 6.7% |
| Plan Type | corporate | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | RTX Corporation | United Parcel Service |
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.3 percentage points (106.1% vs 90.7%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.