Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund vs SEIU National Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) and SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 83% and 98% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

SEIU National Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (97.7% vs 82.6%). SEIU National Industry Pension Fund covers 21,789 participants.

MetricSheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSEIU National Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
91/100 (A)99/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.6%97.7%*
Total Assets$7.5B$272.5M
Total Liabilities$9.1B$278.9M*
Unfunded Liability$1.6B$6.4M*
Participants148,96521,789
1-Year Investment Return5.3%*4.9%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorSheet Metal Workers International AssociationService Employees International Union

SEIU National Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (97.7% vs 82.6%). SEIU National Industry Pension Fund covers 21,789 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons