State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (80.2% vs 81.2%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 80/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2% | 81.2%* |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $51.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $63.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $11.9B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 438,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Illinois |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (80.2% vs 81.2%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.