Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) and UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 80% and 86% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.7 percentage points (85.9% vs 80.2%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)93/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
80.2%85.9%*
Total Assets$90.0B$5.2B
Total Liabilities$112.2B$6.0B*
Unfunded Liability$22.2B$848.9M*
Participants507,000365,494
1-Year Investment Return6.0%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of OhioUFCW International

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.7 percentage points (85.9% vs 80.2%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More