Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) (B) and California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 78% and 73% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.2 percentage points (72.9% vs 78.1%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)73/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%*72.9%
Total Assets$193.0B$318.0B
Total Liabilities$247.0B*$436.0B
Unfunded Liability$54.0B*$118.0B
Participants1,730,000985,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%6.2%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorState of TexasState of California

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.2 percentage points (72.9% vs 78.1%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.

Explore More