Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) (B) and New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 78% and 95% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 17.2 percentage points (95.3% vs 78.1%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%95.3%*
Total Assets$193.0B$248.0B
Total Liabilities$247.0B*$260.2B
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$12.2B*
Participants1,730,0001,070,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%7.1%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasState of New York

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 17.2 percentage points (95.3% vs 78.1%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.

Explore More