Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) grades B while State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D. Funding ratios: 78% vs 44%.

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.1%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%*44.1%
Total Assets$193.0B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$51.0B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$28.5B*
Participants1,730,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatecritical
SponsorState of TexasState of Illinois

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.1%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

Explore More