Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 78.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B) | 93/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.1% | 85.9%* |
| Total Assets | $193.0B | $5.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $247.0B | $6.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $54.0B | $848.9M* |
| Participants | 1,730,000 | 365,494 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1%* | 4.8% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Texas | UFCW International |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 78.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.