Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 60.1%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 60.1% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $29.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B | $48.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $19.3B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 322,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.2% | 5.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Local 710 | State of Mississippi |
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 60.1%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.