Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 77.3%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 77.3% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $84.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $108.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $24.7B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 375,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.2% | 5.7%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Local 710 | State of Oregon |
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 77.3%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.