Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.
| Metric | Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund | Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1% | 106.1%* |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $43.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B | $41.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B | $0* |
| Participants | 634,861 | 288,395 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.2% | 7.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Local 710 | RTX Corporation |
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.