Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund (A) and University of California Retirement Plan (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 84% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.5%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 83.5% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Local 710 | University of California |
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.5%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.