Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 64.2 percentage points (86.2% vs 22.0%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 81/100 (A)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 86.2%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $39.5B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $45.8B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.3B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 385,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | Texas Counties | Teamsters Central States |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 64.2 percentage points (86.2% vs 22.0%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.