Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.7 percentage points (86.2% vs 83.5%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 81/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 86.2%* | 83.5% |
| Total Assets | $39.5B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $45.8B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.3B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 385,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Texas Counties | University of California |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.7 percentage points (86.2% vs 83.5%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.