Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.4 percentage points (86.2% vs 77.8%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 81/100 (A)* | 71/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 86.2%* | 77.8% |
| Total Assets | $39.5B | $44.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $45.8B* | $56.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.3B* | $12.6B |
| Participants | 385,000 | 335,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Texas Counties | United Parcel Service |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.4 percentage points (86.2% vs 77.8%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.