UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.1 percentage points (85.9% vs 83.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A)* | 80/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9%* | 83.8% |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $56.1B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $9.1B |
| Participants | 365,494 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | State of Missouri |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.1 percentage points (85.9% vs 83.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.