Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund and New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A while New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) grades C. Funding ratios: 86% vs 48%.

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 48.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricUFCW International Union Industry Pension FundNew Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
93/100 (A)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
85.9%*48.1%
Total Assets$5.2B$28.5B
Total Liabilities$6.0B*$59.3B
Unfunded Liability$848.9M*$30.8B
Participants365,494268,000
1-Year Investment Return4.8%4.9%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorUFCW InternationalState of New Jersey

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 48.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More