UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 48.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A)* | 51/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9%* | 48.1% |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $28.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $59.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $30.8B |
| Participants | 365,494 | 268,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 4.9%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | State of New Jersey |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (85.9% vs 48.1%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.