UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund and NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A while NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades B. Funding ratios: 86% vs 74%.
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.7 percentage points (85.9% vs 74.2%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 365,494 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 5.4%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | New York City |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.7 percentage points (85.9% vs 74.2%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.