UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) and Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 20.2 percentage points (106.1% vs 85.9%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9% | 106.1%* |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $43.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $41.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M | $0* |
| Participants | 365,494 | 288,395 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 7.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | RTX Corporation |
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 20.2 percentage points (106.1% vs 85.9%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.