Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund and School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A while School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) grades B. Funding ratios: 86% vs 68%.

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 18.0 percentage points (85.9% vs 67.9%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricUFCW International Union Industry Pension FundSchool Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
93/100 (A)*66/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
85.9%*67.9%
Total Assets$5.2B$16.2B
Total Liabilities$6.0B*$23.9B
Unfunded Liability$848.9M*$7.7B
Participants365,494218,000
1-Year Investment Return4.8%5.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorUFCW InternationalState of Ohio

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 18.0 percentage points (85.9% vs 67.9%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More