UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.8 percentage points (90.7% vs 85.9%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A) | 95/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9% | 90.7%* |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $9.7B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $10.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $993.0M |
| Participants | 365,494 | 243,932 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | United Parcel Service |
UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.8 percentage points (90.7% vs 85.9%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.