UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) and UPS Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 91% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.8 percentage points (90.7% vs 85.9%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A) | 95/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9% | 90.7%* |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $9.7B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $10.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $993.0M |
| Participants | 365,494 | 243,932 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | United Parcel Service |
UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.8 percentage points (90.7% vs 85.9%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.