Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 59.9 percentage points (81.9% vs 22.0%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.9%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $56.2B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.2B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 590,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | Teamsters Central States |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 59.9 percentage points (81.9% vs 22.0%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.