Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 80.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.9%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $56.2B* | $83.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.2B* | $16.5B |
| Participants | 590,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | General Motors |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 80.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.