Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustRaytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%106.1%*
Total Assets$55.6B$43.8B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$41.3B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$0*
Participants634,861288,395
1-Year Investment Return6.2%7.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployercorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceRTX Corporation

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

Explore More