Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs General Electric Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (98.4% vs 76.2%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | General Electric Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 76.2% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $38.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $50.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $12.0B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 318,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.8% |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (98.4% vs 76.2%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.