Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 18.3 percentage points (98.4% vs 80.1%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $83.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $16.5B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | General Motors |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 18.3 percentage points (98.4% vs 80.1%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.